Why Labelling Machines Bounce: 9 Root Causes and How to Fix Them Properly

When a labelling machine underperforms, the symptoms are obvious: skewed labels, inconsistent placement, reduced speeds, frustrated operators, and rising reject rates. What is far less obvious — and far more important — is the root cause.

Across Australian manufacturing sites, labelling issues are often treated as isolated faults rather than system-level problems. Operators adjust guides, slow the line, replace rollers, or swap adhesives, only to find the problem returns weeks later. This cycle creates ongoing downtime, inefficiency, and lost confidence in the equipment.

At Impresstik, we approach labelling performance from an engineering perspective. In almost every case, the issue is not “the labeller”, but how the container, label, environment, and line configuration interact.

This article breaks down the nine most common root causes of labelling problems and explains how they should be fixed properly — not temporarily.

Symptoms vs causes: why fixes often fail

Before addressing specific issues, it’s important to distinguish between symptoms and causes.

Symptoms include:

  • labels skewing or drifting

  • wrinkles or air bubbles

  • labels lifting after application

  • inconsistent placement

  • reduced line speed

  • frequent operator intervention

Treating symptoms without identifying causes leads to repeated breakdowns. Proper fixes require understanding what is actually happening at the point of application.

Root cause 1: Container instability

One of the most common causes of labelling issues is container movement during application.

Lightweight PET bottles, flexible personal care packaging, and tall containers are especially prone to instability. Even slight movement during label contact can result in skew or misalignment.

Proper fix:
Engineering stabilisation into the system. This may include:

  • custom guides

  • wrap stations

  • side belts

  • top hold-downs

  • container-specific handling components

Slowing the line is not a fix — stabilisation is.

Root cause 2: Incorrect label size or placement

Labels that are too tall, too long, or positioned near bottle shoulders or bases are inherently unstable during application.

This often leads to:

  • wrinkling

  • edge lifting

  • inconsistent overlap

  • visible seams

Proper fix:
Review label dimensions in relation to:

  • container geometry

  • material rigidity

  • adhesive characteristics

  • application speed

Correcting label size often resolves issues without changing machinery.

Root cause 3: Mismatch between label material and application speed

Not all label stocks behave the same way. Some materials require more dwell time to adhere properly, especially at higher speeds or in cold environments.

Pushing speed without considering material behaviour leads to poor adhesion and inconsistent results.

Proper fix:
Align label material selection with:

  • speed targets

  • environment

  • container material

Engineering solutions may also include extended wrap or controlled application angles.

Root cause 4: Environmental conditions

Cold rooms, condensation, humidity, and washdown environments dramatically affect label performance.

Moisture interferes with adhesive activation and increases the risk of lifting edges or complete label failure.

Proper fix:
Design the labelling system for the environment by:

  • selecting appropriate adhesives

  • modifying application geometry

  • adding stabilisation

  • engineering moisture-tolerant handling

Ignoring environmental factors guarantees recurring problems.

Root cause 5: Inadequate integration with the production line

A labeller does not operate in isolation. Poor integration with upstream fillers or downstream equipment can cause inconsistent container spacing and speed fluctuations.

These inconsistencies directly affect label placement accuracy.

Proper fix:
Engineering proper line integration, including:

  • conveyor matching

  • speed synchronisation

  • spacing control

  • infeed and outfeed stability

Integration issues must be solved at the system level, not at the applicator alone.

Root cause 6: Excessive variation between SKUs

Running vastly different container sizes, shapes, and labels through the same setup without adjustment increases error rates.

Quick fixes often involve operators manually compensating for changes, which introduces variability and fatigue.

Proper fix:
Design changeover-friendly systems with:

  • repeatable settings

  • guided adjustments

  • modular components

This reduces reliance on operator judgement and improves consistency.

Root cause 7: Sensor and control limitations

Outdated or poorly positioned sensors can cause mistimed label release, especially at higher speeds.

This results in drifting placement, missed labels, or double application.

Proper fix:
Upgrade or reposition sensors and controls to match:

  • container characteristics

  • speed requirements

  • label feed behaviour

Modern control systems significantly improve repeatability.

Root cause 8: Worn or inappropriate components

Over time, wear on rollers, belts, guides, and peel plates reduces accuracy.

Temporary adjustments may hide the issue but do not restore original performance.

Proper fix:
Regular service and component inspection to:

  • identify wear early

  • replace parts proactively

  • recalibrate application geometry

Preventative maintenance is far more cost-effective than reactive fixes.

Service
https://www.impresstik.com/service

Root cause 9: Treating engineering problems as maintenance issues

Perhaps the most damaging mistake is assuming every issue can be solved through maintenance alone.

Some problems are design-related and require engineering changes, not servicing.

Proper fix:
Engage engineering review when:

  • issues persist despite servicing

  • production requirements change

  • new containers or labels are introduced

  • speeds increase

Understanding when to service versus redesign saves time and money.

Why engineering-led fixes outperform quick adjustments

Engineering-led solutions address the entire system:

  • container handling

  • label behaviour

  • machine configuration

  • integration

  • environment

This approach eliminates recurring faults and allows the labelling system to operate at its intended capacity.

Self-Adhesive Labelling Machinery
https://www.impresstik.com/labelling-machinery

When to service and when to upgrade

A simple rule of thumb:

  • If performance has gradually declined, service may be sufficient.

  • If issues appeared after a change in product, speed, or environment, engineering modification is likely required.

An honest assessment prevents wasted spend on ineffective fixes.

The takeaway

Labelling problems rarely have a single cause. They are almost always the result of multiple interacting factors that must be addressed together.

Proper fixes are engineered, not improvised.

Speak with our engineering team

If your labelling machine is slowing production or causing inconsistent results, our team can identify the true cause and recommend the correct solution — whether that’s service, optimisation, or redesign.

If your labelling station is slowing production, speak with our team and we’ll pinpoint the true cause and recommend the right fix.

Self-Adhesive Labelling Machinery
https://www.impresstik.com/labelling-machinery

Service
https://www.impresstik.com/service

Contact Us
https://www.impresstik.com/contact-us

Ben Crowther

Wholistic Marketing Consultant

https://www.crowflies.net
Previous
Previous

Moisture, Cold Rooms, and Condensation: How to Keep Labels Stuck at Speed

Next
Next

2001VAC In-Line Labeller: When It’s the Right Fit (and When It’s Not)